Helicone vs ozDNA
for vertical AI teams

Helicone excels at LLM observability — logging, tracing, and cost visibility across providers. ozDNA is vertical AI infrastructure: observability plus RAG operating layer, routing policy, and margin controls for production workflows.

Gateway vs vertical AI infrastructure

Fair comparison — choose Helicone when routing and proxy fit is enough. Choose ozDNA when RAG reliability, token economics, and live vertical proof matter. Live proof: TezMakale.

CapabilityHeliconeozDNA
Multi-provider LLM routing Yes Yes
Fallback / retry across models Yes Yes
Cost per request / workflow Basic logging First-class cost engine
Usage economics (credits → real LLM spend) Yes
Production RAG (chunk, ingest, hybrid retrieval) RAG operating layer
Vertical modes (academic, legal, financial) Prompt + corpus per mode
Live production vertical AI proof Varies TezMakale (live)
Deployment model SaaS / self-host Managed PaaS (private beta)

You need more than
a routing proxy.

01

Margin-aware AI SaaS

Map user credits to real inference cost. Route cheap models for bulk tasks, premium models for quality-critical steps.

02

RAG that survives launch

Chunking, freshness, hybrid retrieval, and eval hooks — not just vector search bolted onto a gateway.

03

Vertical depth

Academic AI at TezMakale. RegTech at ComplyDNA. Same stack, different corpora.

Not a fork — a live product on ozDNA

TezMakale handles real student traffic in Turkey: AI detection, detailed reports, token limits, peak-season spikes.

Evaluating Helicone?

Join early access — mention Helicone on the waitlist. We will map your workflows onto ozDNA.

Get Early Access

Helicone is a separate project; this page compares product fit, not affiliation.